It is just bizarre to me that the forces of these organizations have joined together to try and defeat George Bush and the Republicans just because they hate. You would thank that seasoned intelligence and media professionals could rise above emotion and the immaturity that plague junior high schoolers
but it appears that it isn't true. To view the clear evidence look no further than the "sandbagging" of Republican candidates at the CNN debate which was no doubt orchestrated by the Clinton machine, NBC's
wildly inaccurate reporting from Iraq about the war and Guantanamo about prisoners there (and the rest of the MSM's
similar approach) and the CI A's outright
incompetence, propaganda and leaks about secrets to the press.
Breaking down a few of these incidents when held to scrutiny during the Clinton administration: Unprovoked and, in at least one case, unapproved (by the UN) wars for Clinton: Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo
, Desert Fox (Iraq). Media, CIA, Liberal Outrage=zero. Wars for Bush: Afghanistan and Iraq. Outrage=100% (Hitler, criminal, "chimp in chief", idiot, fool, evil, imperialist, fascist
, etc). The rendition program and it's "evil" twin extraordinary rendition (taking illegal enemy combatants to foreign countries to be held without rights and interrogated by the CIA). Invented in the late 1980's and used extensively by the Clinton administration who worked with Poland, Romania, the Czech Republic and East European countries to make terrorist suspects disappear below the legal radar screen. Outrage=zero (Al Gore, on the record has been quoted as saying "Of course getting this guy (terrorist leader) is against international law but so what? He's a terrorist, grab is ass!"). Bush administration using the existing prison and rendition system that the Clinton's and the CIA setup, outrage=100% "Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, he will use them" Speech by Clinton in 1998. Outrage=zero George Bush, 2002, same speech and..."lied and people died". Outrage=100%
Shall I go on? No? What chance will conservatives have of winning the presidency
in 2008? Less than 50/50 and no because Americans just want a Democrat after all "these years of suffering". That's what the aforementioned organizations want you to think, that's their spin, their i"inevitability
" marketing ploy. That will be difficult to overcome.
to mind a bigger issue: None of these organizations (especially the CIA) should be in any way partisan. Isn't that disturbing that the fate of the free world can be controlled by these people (no matter their agenda or politics). They're just supposed to report and analyze aren't they? Who died and made them king makers?